GCBC vs. EOSE
GCBC (Greene County Bancorp, Inc.) and EOSE (Eos Energy Enterprises Inc) are both stocks. GCBC operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while EOSE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, GCBC returned 19.57%/yr vs -24.50%/yr for EOSE. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GCBC vs. EOSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCBC achieves a 45.46% return, which is significantly higher than EOSE's -61.61% return.
GCBC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 45.40%
- YTD
- 45.46%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 19.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.21%
EOSE
- 1D
- -3.93%
- 1M
- -27.39%
- 6M
- -71.20%
- YTD
- -61.61%
- 1Y
- -4.97%
- 3Y*
- -1.83%
- 5Y*
- -24.50%
- 10Y*
- —
GCBC vs. EOSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCBC Greene County Bancorp, Inc. | 45.46% | -18.53% | -0.61% | -0.57% | 57.91% | 46.75% | 18.10% |
EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises Inc | -61.61% | 135.80% | 345.87% | -26.35% | -80.32% | -63.92% | 112.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCBC and EOSE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
GCBC:
$546.01M
EOSE:
$1.27B
GCBC:
$2.51
EOSE:
-$1.33
GCBC:
3.41
EOSE:
9.83
GCBC:
$106.77M
EOSE:
$160.71M
GCBC:
$63.62M
EOSE:
-$163.73M
GCBC:
$33.26M
EOSE:
-$858.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCBC vs. EOSE — Risk / Return Rank
GCBC
EOSE
GCBC vs. EOSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (GCBC) and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCBC | EOSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.10 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | -0.07 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | -0.12 | +3.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCBC vs. EOSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCBC drawdown since its inception was -53.06%, smaller than the maximum EOSE drawdown of -97.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCBC and EOSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCBC | EOSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.06% | -97.88% | +44.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.16% | -77.10% | +60.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.92% | -83.25% | +40.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.06% | -96.60% | +43.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.83% | -85.55% | +73.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.62% | -72.47% | +57.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.30% | 43.75% | -34.45% |
Volatility
GCBC vs. EOSE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (GCBC) is 13.80%, while Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) has a volatility of 24.23%. This indicates that GCBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EOSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCBC | EOSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.80% | 24.23% | -10.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.34% | 91.28% | -67.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.12% | 114.42% | -78.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.52% | 117.53% | -74.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.61% | 112.69% | -70.08% |
Dividends
GCBC vs. EOSE - Dividend Comparison
GCBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while EOSE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCBC Greene County Bancorp, Inc. | 1.25% | 1.71% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 1.80% | 1.46% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.64% | 2.28% |
Financials
GCBC vs. EOSE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greene County Bancorp, Inc. and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GCBC and EOSE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EOSE has higher volatility (24.23%) compared to GCBC (13.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCBC dropped -53.06% vs EOSE's -97.88%.
GCBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCBC and EOSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer