PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCBC vs. EOSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GCBC vs. EOSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (GCBC) and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCBC achieves a 45.46% return, which is significantly higher than EOSE's -61.61% return.


GCBC

1D
0.06%
1M
6.30%
6M
45.40%
YTD
45.46%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
19.57%
10Y*
16.21%

EOSE

1D
-3.93%
1M
-27.39%
6M
-71.20%
YTD
-61.61%
1Y
-4.97%
3Y*
-1.83%
5Y*
-24.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCBC vs. EOSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GCBC
Greene County Bancorp, Inc.
45.46%-18.53%-0.61%-0.57%57.91%46.75%18.10%
EOSE
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc
-61.61%135.80%345.87%-26.35%-80.32%-63.92%112.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GCBC and EOSE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GCBC:

$546.01M

EOSE:

$1.27B

EPS

GCBC:

$2.51

EOSE:

-$1.33

PS Ratio

GCBC:

3.41

EOSE:

9.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

GCBC:

$106.77M

EOSE:

$160.71M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GCBC:

$63.62M

EOSE:

-$163.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

GCBC:

$33.26M

EOSE:

-$858.77M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCBC vs. EOSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCBC
GCBC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GCBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCBC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GCBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

EOSE
EOSE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EOSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOSE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EOSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOSE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCBC vs. EOSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (GCBC) and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCBCEOSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.10

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

-0.07

+2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

-0.12

+3.50

GCBC vs. EOSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCBC Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the EOSE Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCBC and EOSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCBC vs. EOSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCBC drawdown since its inception was -53.06%, smaller than the maximum EOSE drawdown of -97.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCBC and EOSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCBCEOSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.06%

-97.88%

+44.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-77.10%

+60.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.92%

-83.25%

+40.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.06%

-96.60%

+43.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.83%

-85.55%

+73.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-72.47%

+57.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.30%

43.75%

-34.45%

Volatility

GCBC vs. EOSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (GCBC) is 13.80%, while Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) has a volatility of 24.23%. This indicates that GCBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EOSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCBCEOSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.80%

24.23%

-10.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.34%

91.28%

-67.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.12%

114.42%

-78.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.52%

117.53%

-74.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.61%

112.69%

-70.08%

Dividends

GCBC vs. EOSE - Dividend Comparison

GCBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while EOSE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EOSE
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCBC
Greene County Bancorp, Inc.
1.25%1.71%1.23%1.06%0.94%1.36%1.80%1.46%1.27%1.18%1.64%2.28%

Financials

GCBC vs. EOSE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greene County Bancorp, Inc. and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
56.96M
(GCBC) Total Revenue
(EOSE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GCBC and EOSE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EOSE has higher volatility (24.23%) compared to GCBC (13.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCBC dropped -53.06% vs EOSE's -97.88%.

GCBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCBC and EOSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer