GCAD vs. KDVD
GCAD (Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF) and KDVD (Keeley Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCAD is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Gabelli, while KDVD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.00% expense ratio.
Performance
GCAD vs. KDVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCAD achieves a 14.09% return, which is significantly higher than KDVD's 10.24% return.
GCAD
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 14.09%
- 6M
- 19.16%
- 1Y
- 35.52%
- 3Y*
- 33.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KDVD
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCAD vs. KDVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF | 14.09% | 3.22% |
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 10.24% | -0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCAD and KDVD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCAD vs. KDVD — Risk / Return Rank
GCAD
KDVD
GCAD vs. KDVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) and Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCAD | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCAD | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.56 | 1.44 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
GCAD vs. KDVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCAD drawdown since its inception was -16.14%, which is greater than KDVD's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCAD and KDVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCAD | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.14% | -10.98% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -2.57% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -2.97% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | — | — |
Volatility
GCAD vs. KDVD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCAD | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 15.20% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 15.20% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 15.20% | +3.29% |
GCAD vs. KDVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCAD has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than KDVD's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GCAD vs. KDVD - Dividend Comparison
GCAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than KDVD's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF | 1.81% | 2.06% | 4.94% | 3.62% |
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 0.71% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCAD and KDVD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.00% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GCAD and KDVD have the same expense ratio: 0.00% per year.
GCAD has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.71% for KDVD.
GCAD is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while KDVD is Mid Cap Blend Equities.
Find the right allocation for GCAD and KDVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer