PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GC=F vs. SPYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GC=F vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Futures (GC=F) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GC=F

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYI

1D
1.53%
1M
1.73%
YTD
7.94%
6M
8.71%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GC=F vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GC=F
Gold Futures
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
7.94%16.67%19.03%18.09%-3.96%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GC=F vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GC=F

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GC=F vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Futures (GC=F) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GC=FSPYIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.87

GC=F vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GC=FSPYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

Volatility

GC=F vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GC=FSPYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.01%

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GC=F and SPYI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer