GC=F vs. PSHG
GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset, while PSHG (Performance Shipping Inc.) is a stock. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GC=F vs. PSHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GC=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PSHG
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -18.54%
- YTD
- -21.60%
- 1Y
- -6.18%
- 3Y*
- 25.75%
- 5Y*
- -53.30%
- 10Y*
- -76.74%
- ALL TIME*
- -67.73%
GC=F vs. PSHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC=F Gold Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.84% |
PSHG Performance Shipping Inc. | -21.60% | 14.52% | -18.06% | -35.88% | -92.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between GC=F and PSHG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GC=F vs. PSHG — Risk / Return Rank
GC=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSHG
GC=F vs. PSHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Futures (GC=F) and Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GC=F | PSHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GC=F vs. PSHG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GC=F | PSHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -100.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -100.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -87.30% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.76% | — |
Volatility
GC=F vs. PSHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GC=F | PSHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 50.81% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 86.88% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 166.02% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
GC=F and PSHG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GC=F and PSHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer