GC=F vs. ASCCY
GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset, while ASCCY (Asics Corp ADR) is a stock. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GC=F vs. ASCCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GC=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASCCY
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 54.90%
- 5Y*
- 36.39%
- 10Y*
- —
GC=F vs. ASCCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC=F Gold Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.84% |
ASCCY Asics Corp ADR | 17.57% | 21.77% | 152.83% | 43.48% | 21.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between GC=F and ASCCY is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GC=F vs. ASCCY — Risk / Return Rank
GC=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ASCCY
GC=F vs. ASCCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Futures (GC=F) and Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GC=F | ASCCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GC=F vs. ASCCY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GC=F | ASCCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -64.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -12.05% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -18.12% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.17% | — |
Volatility
GC=F vs. ASCCY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GC=F | ASCCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 41.05% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 44.88% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 47.06% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
GC=F and ASCCY have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GC=F and ASCCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer