PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GBUL.TO vs. GBSL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GBUL.TO vs. GBSL.TO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GBUL.TO (Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF) and GBSL.TO (Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBUL.TO is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while GBSL.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Ninepoint. GBUL.TO is passively managed, while GBSL.TO is actively managed. GBUL.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GBSL.TO.

Performance

GBUL.TO vs. GBSL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF (GBUL.TO) and Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

GBUL.TO

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

GBSL.TO

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF

Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF

Often compared with GBUL.TO:
GBUL.TO vs. ZGLD.TOGBUL.TO vs. AMAX.TOGBUL.TO vs. CGL.TOGBUL.TO vs. CGXF.TOGBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TOGBUL.TO vs. GLCC.TOGBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO
Often compared with GBSL.TO:
GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TOGBSL.TO vs. ECHI.TOGBSL.TO vs. GEQT.TOGBSL.TO vs. HEQT.TOGBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TOGBSL.TO vs. NNRG.NEOGBSL.TO vs. TEQT.TO

Return for Risk

GBUL.TO vs. GBSL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF (GBUL.TO) and Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBUL.TO vs. GBSL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBUL.TO vs. GBSL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility

GBUL.TO vs. GBSL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

GBUL.TO vs. GBSL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBUL.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GBSL.TO's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBUL.TO vs. GBSL.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBUL.TO nor GBSL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

On fees, GBUL.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBUL.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GBSL.TO.

GBUL.TO is categorized as Gold, while GBSL.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GBUL.TO and 0.85% for GBSL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBUL.TO and GBSL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer