PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GBUL.TO (Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF) and ECHI.TO (Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBUL.TO is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while ECHI.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Ninepoint. GBUL.TO is passively managed, while ECHI.TO is actively managed. GBUL.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for ECHI.TO.

Performance

GBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF (GBUL.TO) and Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

GBUL.TO

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ECHI.TO

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF

Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF

Often compared with GBUL.TO:
GBUL.TO vs. ZGLD.TOGBUL.TO vs. AMAX.TOGBUL.TO vs. CGL.TOGBUL.TO vs. CGXF.TOGBUL.TO vs. GBSL.TOGBUL.TO vs. GLCC.TOGBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO
Often compared with ECHI.TO:
ECHI.TO vs. HHIC.TOECHI.TO vs. HDIV.TOECHI.TO vs. HHIS.TOECHI.TO vs. DXQ.TOECHI.TO vs. INTY.TOECHI.TO vs. CRCY.TOECHI.TO vs. HBTE.NEO

Return for Risk

GBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF (GBUL.TO) and Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility

GBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

GBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBUL.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ECHI.TO's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBUL.TO nor ECHI.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

On fees, ECHI.TO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ECHI.TO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GBUL.TO.

GBUL.TO is categorized as Gold, while ECHI.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GBUL.TO and 0.29% for ECHI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBUL.TO and ECHI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer