GBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO
GBUL.TO (Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF) and HGGG.TO (Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF) are both Gold funds - GBUL.TO tracks the LBMA Gold Price while HGGG.TO tracks the Solactive Global Gold Giants Index TR. Both are passively managed. GBUL.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HGGG.TO.
Performance
GBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GBUL.TO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HGGG.TO
- 1D
- -8.09%
- 1M
- -12.74%
- YTD
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -2.50%
- 1Y
- 54.73%
- 3Y*
- 43.74%
- 5Y*
- 22.41%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GBUL.TO
HGGG.TO
GBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF (GBUL.TO) and Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBUL.TO | HGGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.67 | — |
Drawdowns
GBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBUL.TO | HGGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -52.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -32.05% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -20.48% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.38% | — |
Volatility
GBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBUL.TO | HGGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 44.36% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 33.07% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 33.00% | — |
GBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBUL.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HGGG.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither GBUL.TO nor HGGG.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBUL.TO Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HGGG.TO Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.65% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HGGG.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HGGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GBUL.TO.
GBUL.TO tracks LBMA Gold Price, while HGGG.TO tracks Solactive Global Gold Giants Index TR. They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GBUL.TO and 0.40% for HGGG.TO.
Find the right allocation for GBUL.TO and HGGG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer