GBUG vs. URNM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GBUG (Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF) and URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBUG is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott, while URNM is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index. GBUG is actively managed, while URNM is passively managed. Over the past year, GBUG returned 63.04% vs 49.43% for URNM. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBUG charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.

Performance

GBUG vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBUG achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's 11.22% return.

GBUG

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: -1.44%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 63.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URNM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: 11.22%
• 6M: 4.99%
• 1Y: 49.43%
• 3Y*: 26.12%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBUG vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	-1.44%	119.00%
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	11.22%	51.17%

Correlation

The correlation between GBUG and URNM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

GBUG vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBUG

GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 37
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

URNM

URNM Risk / Return Rank: 29
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 28
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBUG vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GBUG	URNM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	0.97	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.60	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.19	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	1.55	+0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.05	3.35	+1.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GBUG vs. URNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the URNM Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBUG and URNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GBUG	URNM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	0.97	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	0.67	+1.07

Drawdowns

GBUG vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBUG drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBUG and URNM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBUG	URNM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.10%	-50.78%	+18.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.10%	-32.04%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.98%	-27.31%	+1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.68%	-18.03%	+10.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.52%	14.81%	-2.29%

Volatility

GBUG vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) have volatilities of 15.44% and 16.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GBUG	URNM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.44%	16.06%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.41%	40.27%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.62%	51.44%	-3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.31%	48.29%	-0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.31%	46.89%	+0.42%

GBUG vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBUG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBUG vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

GBUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than URNM's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	1.58%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	2.86%	3.18%	3.18%	3.63%	0.00%	6.70%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBUG and URNM in my portfolio?

GBUG and URNM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GBUG or URNM?

URNM has higher volatility (16.06%) compared to GBUG (15.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBUG dropped -32.10% vs URNM's -50.78%.

Which ETF is better, GBUG or URNM?

On 1-year performance, GBUG leads with 63.04% vs 49.43% for URNM. On fees, URNM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GBUG has been the lower-risk option at 15.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GBUG or URNM?

Over the 1-year period, GBUG has performed better with a 63.04% return vs 49.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GBUG or URNM?

URNM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for GBUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GBUG or URNM?

URNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.58% for GBUG.

What is the main difference between GBUG and URNM?

GBUG is categorized as Gold, while URNM is Commodity Producers Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for GBUG and 0.85% for URNM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.