GBND vs. GSST

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GBND (Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF) and GSST (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBND is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBND charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for GSST.

Performance

GBND vs. GSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF (GBND) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBND achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than GSST's 1.56% return.

GBND

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSST

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 1.89%
• 1Y: 4.58%
• 3Y*: 5.52%
• 5Y*: 3.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBND vs. GSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GBND Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF	0.36%	3.49%
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.56%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GBND and GSST is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

GBND vs. GSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSST

GSST Risk / Return Rank: 99
GSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBND vs. GSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF (GBND) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GBND	GSST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	7.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	5.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	3.79	-2.64

Drawdowns

GBND vs. GSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBND drawdown since its inception was -2.76%, smaller than the maximum GSST drawdown of -3.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBND and GSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBND	GSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.76%	-3.51%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-1.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	0.00%	-1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.64%	-0.16%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GBND	GSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61%	0.58%	+3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.61%	0.63%	+2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.61%	0.86%	+2.75%

GBND vs. GSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBND has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GSST's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GBND vs. GSST - Dividend Comparison

GBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than GSST's 4.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GBND Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF	3.45%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.32%	4.56%	5.45%	4.98%	1.97%	0.71%	1.12%	1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBND and GSST in my portfolio?

GBND and GSST have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GBND or GSST?

On fees, GSST is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GBND or GSST?

GSST is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GBND or GSST?

GSST has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 3.45% for GBND.

What is the main difference between GBND and GSST?

GBND is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while GSST is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GBND and 0.16% for GSST.