GBND vs. BBAG
GBND (Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF) and BBAG (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past year, GBND returned 4.75% vs 4.49% for BBAG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GBND charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BBAG.
Performance
GBND vs. BBAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBND achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than BBAG's 0.95% return.
GBND
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBAG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
GBND vs. BBAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GBND Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF | 1.03% | 3.68% |
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.95% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBND and BBAG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBND vs. BBAG — Risk / Return Rank
GBND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBAG
GBND vs. BBAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF (GBND) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GBND | BBAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GBND vs. BBAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBND drawdown since its inception was -2.76%, smaller than the maximum BBAG drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBND and BBAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBND | BBAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -18.73% | +15.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -2.78% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -2.09% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -6.19% | +5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.99% | — |
Volatility
GBND vs. BBAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBND | BBAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 3.90% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 5.94% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 5.79% | -2.13% |
GBND vs. BBAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBND has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GBND vs. BBAG - Dividend Comparison
GBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than BBAG's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.33% | 4.29% | 4.25% | 3.60% | 2.23% | 1.44% | 2.26% | 2.92% | 0.16% |
GBND Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF | 3.43% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, GBND and BBAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On 1-year performance, GBND leads with 4.75% vs 4.49% for BBAG. On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GBND has performed better with a 4.75% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GBND.
BBAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 3.43% for GBND.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GBND and 0.03% for BBAG.
Find the right allocation for GBND and BBAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer