PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBLD vs. PLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBLD vs. PLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF (GBLD) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GBLD vs. PLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GBLD
Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF
4.52%17.95%-5.63%6.39%-21.69%-5.35%
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
-9.19%12.03%23.47%27.47%-22.52%11.57%

Returns By Period


GBLD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLDR

1D
2.64%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
-9.19%
6M
-5.46%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GBLD vs. PLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PLDR's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GBLD vs. PLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBLD

PLDR
PLDR Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBLD vs. PLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF (GBLD) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBLD vs. PLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBLDPLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

Correlation

The correlation between GBLD and PLDR is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GBLD vs. PLDR - Dividend Comparison

GBLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than PLDR's 0.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
GBLD
Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF
3.45%3.27%5.34%6.60%3.79%3.16%
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
0.41%0.37%0.38%0.56%0.63%0.39%

Drawdowns

GBLD vs. PLDR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GBLDPLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

Volatility

GBLD vs. PLDR - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GBLDPLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%