GBLD vs. FMAT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GBLD (Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF) and FMAT (Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBLD is a Sustainable fund tracking the MSCI Global Green Building Index, while FMAT is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GBLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FMAT.

Performance

GBLD vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF (GBLD) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GBLD

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMAT

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 22.50%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 10.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBLD vs. FMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GBLD Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF	4.52%	17.95%	-5.63%	6.39%	-21.69%	-2.45%
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	13.04%	12.11%	0.47%	13.71%	-11.54%	11.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GBLD and FMAT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2021	0.64

The correlation between GBLD and FMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GBLD vs. FMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAT

FMAT Risk / Return Rank: 34
FMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBLD vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF (GBLD) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GBLD	FMAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.45	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GBLD	FMAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-41.11%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.48%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.97%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.87%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GBLD	FMAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.66%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.60%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.19%	—

GBLD vs. FMAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAT's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBLD vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison

GBLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than FMAT's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	1.42%	1.64%	1.68%	1.71%	2.00%	1.44%	1.73%	1.89%	2.18%	1.53%	1.78%	2.16%
GBLD Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF	3.45%	3.27%	5.34%	6.60%	3.79%	3.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBLD and FMAT in my portfolio?

GBLD and FMAT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GBLD or FMAT?

On fees, FMAT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GBLD or FMAT?

FMAT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GBLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GBLD or FMAT?

GBLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.42% for FMAT.

What is the main difference between GBLD and FMAT?

GBLD is categorized as Sustainable, while FMAT is Materials. GBLD tracks MSCI Global Green Building Index, while FMAT tracks MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GBLD and 0.08% for FMAT.