PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBDC vs. DGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBDC vs. DGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBDC achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than DGS's 14.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GBDC has underperformed DGS with an annualized return of 6.73%, while DGS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.


GBDC

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.53%
YTD
0.68%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
-2.64%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
6.73%

DGS

1D
0.65%
1M
1.57%
YTD
14.94%
6M
17.07%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBDC vs. DGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
0.68%-0.50%13.57%27.69%-6.99%17.78%-14.73%21.09%-2.20%6.27%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
14.94%21.18%1.13%19.08%-12.35%15.33%4.06%18.90%-16.52%37.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GBDC and DGS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2010

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBDC vs. DGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBDC
GBDC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBDC vs. DGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBDCDGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.27

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

2.38

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

7.84

-8.15

GBDC vs. DGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the DGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBDC and DGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBDC vs. DGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBDC drawdown since its inception was -47.30%, smaller than the maximum DGS drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBDC and DGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBDCDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.30%

-61.83%

+14.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.20%

-10.06%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-19.31%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-24.86%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.30%

-44.08%

-3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-1.05%

-5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.13%

-12.57%

+6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.56%

3.05%

+5.51%

Volatility

GBDC vs. DGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is 5.60%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that GBDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBDCDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

7.30%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

14.27%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.15%

16.60%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

15.08%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.56%

17.39%

+4.17%

Dividends

GBDC vs. DGS - Dividend Comparison

GBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, more than DGS's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.20%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
11.29%11.50%12.73%10.00%9.35%7.58%8.44%7.70%8.49%7.47%8.32%7.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBDC and DGS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGS has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to GBDC (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBDC dropped -47.30% vs DGS's -61.83%.

DGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBDC and DGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer