PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBDC vs. CGBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GBDC vs. CGBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) and TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBDC achieves a -4.06% return, which is significantly higher than CGBD's -12.43% return.


GBDC

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
-4.06%
6M
-2.99%
1Y
-4.72%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
5.88%

CGBD

1D
-1.59%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
-12.43%
6M
-10.02%
1Y
-13.81%
3Y*
1.11%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBDC vs. CGBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
-4.06%-0.50%13.57%27.69%-6.99%17.78%-14.73%21.09%-2.20%-2.67%
CGBD
TCG BDC, Inc.
-12.43%-21.53%33.53%18.01%17.70%49.48%-8.34%21.62%-31.01%20.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GBDC and CGBD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.52

The correlation between GBDC and CGBD shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

GBDC:

$0.95

CGBD:

$1.02

PE Ratio

GBDC:

13.02

CGBD:

10.33

PS Ratio

GBDC:

3.93

CGBD:

2.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

GBDC:

$831.29M

CGBD:

$226.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GBDC:

$525.36M

CGBD:

$123.55M

EBITDA (TTM)

GBDC:

$506.70M

CGBD:

$85.61M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBDC vs. CGBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBDC
GBDC Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CGBD
CGBD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CGBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGBD Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CGBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGBD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBDC vs. CGBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) and TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBDCCGBDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.91

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

-0.70

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.54

-1.33

+0.79

GBDC vs. CGBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is higher than the CGBD Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBDC and CGBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBDC vs. CGBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBDC drawdown since its inception was -47.30%, smaller than the maximum CGBD drawdown of -71.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBDC and CGBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBDCCGBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.30%

-71.09%

+23.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.20%

-19.72%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-35.06%

+16.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-35.06%

+15.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.18%

-33.62%

+22.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-12.58%

+6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.72%

10.41%

-1.69%

Volatility

GBDC vs. CGBD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is 6.19%, while TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that GBDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBDCCGBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

6.74%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.23%

17.73%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

22.08%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

21.63%

-4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

34.66%

-13.07%

Dividends

GBDC vs. CGBD - Dividend Comparison

GBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, less than CGBD's 15.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGBD
TCG BDC, Inc.
15.17%13.21%10.43%11.76%11.46%10.92%14.33%13.00%13.55%6.09%0.00%0.00%
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
11.66%11.50%12.73%10.00%9.35%7.58%8.44%7.70%8.49%7.47%8.32%7.70%

Financials

GBDC vs. CGBD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and TCG BDC, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
184.79M
64.08M
(GBDC) Total Revenue
(CGBD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GBDC vs. CGBD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and TCG BDC, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
GBDC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 184.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CGBD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TCG BDC, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 64.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GBDC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 184.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CGBD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TCG BDC, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 64.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GBDC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 184.79M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

CGBD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TCG BDC, Inc. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 64.08M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GBDC and CGBD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGBD has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to GBDC (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBDC dropped -47.30% vs CGBD's -71.09%.

GBDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.25 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBDC and CGBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer