PortfoliosLab logo
GBDC vs. MFIC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GBDC and MFIC is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GBDC vs. MFIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) and MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
250.24%
64.73%
GBDC
MFIC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GBDC:

-0.43

MFIC:

-0.44

Sortino Ratio

GBDC:

-0.50

MFIC:

-0.46

Omega Ratio

GBDC:

0.94

MFIC:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

GBDC:

-0.48

MFIC:

-0.41

Martin Ratio

GBDC:

-1.07

MFIC:

-1.08

Ulcer Index

GBDC:

7.60%

MFIC:

10.28%

Daily Std Dev

GBDC:

18.70%

MFIC:

25.42%

Max Drawdown

GBDC:

-48.15%

MFIC:

-87.97%

Current Drawdown

GBDC:

-9.69%

MFIC:

-16.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GBDC:

$3.80B

MFIC:

$1.12B

EPS

GBDC:

$1.33

MFIC:

$1.27

PE Ratio

GBDC:

10.77

MFIC:

9.38

PS Ratio

GBDC:

4.81

MFIC:

3.74

PB Ratio

GBDC:

0.95

MFIC:

0.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

GBDC:

$725.56M

MFIC:

$81.67M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GBDC:

$725.56M

MFIC:

$55.05M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBDC achieves a -4.08% return, which is significantly higher than MFIC's -8.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GBDC has outperformed MFIC with an annualized return of 7.45%, while MFIC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.58% annualized return.


GBDC

YTD

-4.08%

1M

5.98%

6M

-2.75%

1Y

-7.78%

5Y*

16.30%

10Y*

7.45%

MFIC

YTD

-8.54%

1M

10.11%

6M

-5.84%

1Y

-11.59%

5Y*

20.14%

10Y*

5.58%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GBDC vs. MFIC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBDC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GBDC is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GBDC is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GBDC is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GBDC is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GBDC is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GBDC is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MFIC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MFIC is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MFIC is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MFIC is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MFIC is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MFIC is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MFIC is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GBDC vs. MFIC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) and MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GBDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is comparable to the MFIC Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBDC and MFIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.43
-0.44
GBDC
MFIC

Dividends

GBDC vs. MFIC - Dividend Comparison

GBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.73%, less than MFIC's 14.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
9.73%12.14%10.00%9.35%7.58%8.37%5.91%8.49%7.47%8.32%7.70%7.14%
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment Corporation
14.36%12.75%11.11%12.37%11.26%15.24%10.31%14.52%10.60%11.95%15.33%10.78%

Drawdowns

GBDC vs. MFIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBDC drawdown since its inception was -48.15%, smaller than the maximum MFIC drawdown of -87.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBDC and MFIC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.69%
-16.44%
GBDC
MFIC

Volatility

GBDC vs. MFIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is 10.77%, while MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) has a volatility of 15.11%. This indicates that GBDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.77%
15.11%
GBDC
MFIC

Financials

GBDC vs. MFIC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Golub Capital BDC, Inc. and MidCap Financial Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20212022202320242025
211.10M
26.62M
(GBDC) Total Revenue
(MFIC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items