GAUG vs. XDIV
GAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August) and XDIV (Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAUG is a Options Trading fund tracking the S&P 500, while XDIV is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Roundhill. GAUG is passively managed, while XDIV is actively managed. Over the past year, GAUG returned 11.61% vs 21.49% for XDIV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XDIV.
Performance
GAUG vs. XDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAUG achieves a 5.87% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV's 10.16% return.
GAUG
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 11.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDIV
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAUG vs. XDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August | 5.87% | 5.65% |
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 10.16% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAUG and XDIV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GAUG and XDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAUG vs. XDIV — Risk / Return Rank
GAUG
XDIV
GAUG vs. XDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAUG | XDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.31 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.36 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.10 | 10.37 | +4.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAUG vs. XDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, which is greater than XDIV's maximum drawdown of -9.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and XDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAUG | XDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -9.16% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.01% | -9.16% | +5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -1.09% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -1.27% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 2.08% | -1.31% |
Volatility
GAUG vs. XDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) is 1.09%, while Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that GAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAUG | XDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 3.99% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.37% | 10.20% | -5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.55% | 12.71% | -7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.43% | 12.67% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.43% | 12.67% | -5.24% |
GAUG vs. XDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAUG vs. XDIV - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAUG nor XDIV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, GAUG and XDIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XDIV has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to GAUG (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAUG dropped -10.08% vs XDIV's -9.16%.
On 1-year performance, XDIV leads with 21.49% vs 11.61% for GAUG. On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XDIV has performed better with a 21.49% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAUG.
GAUG and XDIV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GAUG is categorized as Options Trading, while XDIV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAUG and 0.08% for XDIV.
GAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAUG and XDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer