PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAUG vs. XDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAUG vs. XDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAUG achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV's 10.63% return.


GAUG

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.59%
YTD
4.97%
6M
5.40%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDIV

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAUG vs. XDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GAUG and XDIV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

0.91

GAUG vs. XDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GAUG
XDIV

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

GAUG
36.2%
XDIV
36.2%

Financial Services

GAUG
11.9%
XDIV
11.9%

Communication Services

GAUG
10.9%
XDIV
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GAUG
10.1%
XDIV
10.1%

Healthcare

GAUG
8.4%
XDIV
8.4%

Industrials

GAUG
8.1%
XDIV
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

GAUG
4.9%
XDIV
4.9%

Energy

GAUG
3.5%
XDIV
3.5%

Utilities

GAUG
2.3%
XDIV
2.3%

Real Estate

GAUG
1.9%
XDIV
1.9%

Basic Materials

GAUG
1.8%
XDIV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAUG vs. XDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAUG
GAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XDIV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAUG vs. XDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAUGXDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.35

GAUG vs. XDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAUGXDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

1.98

-0.33

Drawdowns

GAUG vs. XDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, which is greater than XDIV's maximum drawdown of -9.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and XDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAUGXDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.08%

-9.16%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.67%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-1.20%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

Volatility

GAUG vs. XDIV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAUGXDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70%

12.31%

-6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

12.31%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.53%

12.31%

-4.78%

GAUG vs. XDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAUG vs. XDIV - Dividend Comparison

Neither GAUG nor XDIV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GAUG and XDIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAUG.

GAUG and XDIV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GAUG is categorized as Options Trading, while XDIV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAUG and 0.09% for XDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAUG and XDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer