GAUG vs. BUFQ
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ).
GAUG and BUFQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GAUG is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Aug 17, 2023. BUFQ is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ 100 Index - USD. It was launched on Jun 15, 2022. Both GAUG and BUFQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GAUG vs. BUFQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAUG vs. BUFQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August | -1.41% | 11.28% | 11.78% | 5.84% |
BUFQ FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF | -1.45% | 14.03% | 16.41% | 7.82% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GAUG having a -1.41% return and BUFQ slightly lower at -1.45%.
GAUG
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 11.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFQ
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -1.45%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAUG vs. BUFQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFQ's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAUG vs. BUFQ — Risk / Return Rank
GAUG
BUFQ
GAUG vs. BUFQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAUG | BUFQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.32 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 2.08 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.32 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 2.07 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.23 | 11.41 | -2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAUG | BUFQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.32 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 1.23 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAUG and BUFQ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GAUG vs. BUFQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAUG nor BUFQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GAUG vs. BUFQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, smaller than the maximum BUFQ drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and BUFQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAUG | BUFQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -15.74% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -8.83% | +1.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -2.86% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -2.41% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 1.60% | -0.33% |
Volatility
GAUG vs. BUFQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) is 2.99%, while FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that GAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAUG | BUFQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 4.25% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.66% | 6.77% | -2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.92% | 13.87% | -3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.69% | 13.56% | -5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.69% | 13.56% | -5.87% |