Correlation
The correlation between BUFQ and QMAR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
BUFQ vs. QMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR).
BUFQ and QMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUFQ is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ 100 Index - USD. It was launched on Jun 15, 2022. QMAR is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BUFQ or QMAR.
Performance
BUFQ vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
BUFQ:
0.64
QMAR:
0.61
BUFQ:
0.99
QMAR:
0.95
BUFQ:
1.15
QMAR:
1.15
BUFQ:
0.61
QMAR:
0.63
BUFQ:
2.32
QMAR:
2.34
BUFQ:
4.16%
QMAR:
4.31%
BUFQ:
15.51%
QMAR:
16.89%
BUFQ:
-15.74%
QMAR:
-19.83%
BUFQ:
-2.09%
QMAR:
-2.96%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFQ achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than QMAR's 0.66% return.
BUFQ
1.53%
5.98%
2.21%
9.88%
N/A
N/A
N/A
QMAR
0.66%
5.11%
1.53%
10.29%
13.42%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUFQ vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFQ has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BUFQ vs. QMAR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BUFQ
QMAR
BUFQ vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
BUFQ vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUFQ nor QMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BUFQ vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFQ drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFQ and QMAR.
Loading data...
Volatility
BUFQ vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) at 3.17%. This indicates that BUFQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...