PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAUG vs. BGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAUG vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAUG achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than BGLD's 0.32% return.


GAUG

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.59%
YTD
4.97%
6M
5.40%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BGLD

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.80%
YTD
0.32%
6M
1.34%
1Y
12.93%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAUG vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August
4.97%11.28%11.78%5.84%
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
0.32%33.03%21.80%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GAUG and BGLD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAUG vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAUG
GAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLD
BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAUG vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAUGBGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.21

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

1.17

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.35

3.72

+14.63

GAUG vs. BGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the BGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAUG and BGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAUGBGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.09

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

1.05

+0.60

Drawdowns

GAUG vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, smaller than the maximum BGLD drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and BGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAUGBGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.08%

-16.19%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

-11.11%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-7.22%

+7.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-3.64%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

3.49%

-2.72%

Volatility

GAUG vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) is 0.75%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that GAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAUGBGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

2.20%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

10.04%

-5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70%

11.90%

-6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

9.97%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.53%

9.89%

-2.36%

GAUG vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAUG vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison

GAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.18%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
44.18%44.32%25.04%10.49%0.40%
GAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAUG and BGLD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGLD has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to GAUG (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAUG dropped -10.08% vs BGLD's -16.19%.

On 1-year performance, GAUG leads with 14.06% vs 12.93% for BGLD. On fees, GAUG is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GAUG has performed better with a 14.06% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GAUG is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.

BGLD has the higher dividend yield at 44.18%, compared with 0.00% for GAUG.

GAUG is categorized as Options Trading, while BGLD is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAUG and 0.91% for BGLD.

GAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAUG and BGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer