GAUG vs. AJAN
GAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August) and AJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026) are both Options Trading funds. GAUG is passively managed, while AJAN is actively managed. Over the past year, GAUG returned 14.06% vs 6.01% for AJAN. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for AJAN.
Performance
GAUG vs. AJAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAUG achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than AJAN's 1.94% return.
GAUG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 14.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AJAN
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 6.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAUG vs. AJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August | 4.97% | 11.28% | 12.09% |
AJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 | 1.94% | 6.12% | 7.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAUG and AJAN is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between GAUG and AJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAUG vs. AJAN — Risk / Return Rank
GAUG
AJAN
GAUG vs. AJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAUG | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.57 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.69 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.35 | 13.54 | +4.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAUG | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.56 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.65 | 1.74 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
GAUG vs. AJAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, which is greater than AJAN's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and AJAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAUG | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -4.11% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.01% | -2.24% | -1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.18% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -0.29% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.44% | +0.33% |
Volatility
GAUG vs. AJAN - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) at 0.67%. This indicates that GAUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAUG | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 0.67% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.33% | 2.05% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.70% | 2.36% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 3.80% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 3.80% | +3.73% |
GAUG vs. AJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAUG vs. AJAN - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAUG nor AJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GAUG and AJAN have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAUG has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to AJAN (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAUG dropped -10.08% vs AJAN's -4.11%.
On 1-year performance, GAUG leads with 14.06% vs 6.01% for AJAN. On fees, AJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GAUG has performed better with a 14.06% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAUG.
GAUG and AJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAUG and 0.79% for AJAN.
AJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAUG and AJAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer