PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJAN vs. BJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AJAN vs. BJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJAN achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than BJAN's 5.95% return.


AJAN

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.72%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BJAN

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
5.95%
6M
6.25%
1Y
18.60%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJAN vs. BJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AJAN and BJAN is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2024

0.77

The correlation between AJAN and BJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJAN vs. BJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJAN
AJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BJAN
BJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJAN vs. BJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AJANBJANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.98

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

14.81

-3.34

AJAN vs. BJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the BJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJAN and BJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AJAN vs. BJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum BJAN drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJAN and BJAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJANBJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-26.86%

+22.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-6.27%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-1.23%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-2.89%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

1.26%

-0.81%

Volatility

AJAN vs. BJAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) is 1.11%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that AJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJANBJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

2.62%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

6.46%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48%

7.94%

-5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.82%

12.02%

-8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.82%

14.05%

-10.23%

AJAN vs. BJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AJAN and BJAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

AJAN vs. BJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither AJAN nor BJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AJAN
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


AJAN and BJAN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BJAN has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to AJAN (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJAN dropped -4.11% vs BJAN's -26.86%.

On 1-year performance, BJAN leads with 18.60% vs 5.20% for AJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, AJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BJAN has performed better with a 18.60% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AJAN and BJAN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

AJAN and BJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

AJAN is categorized as Options Trading, while BJAN is Defined Outcome.

BJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJAN and BJAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer