PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. TGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. TGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than TGRT's 1.18% return.


GARP

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.22%
6M
14.45%
YTD
16.89%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
28.85%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.07%

TGRT

1D
0.70%
1M
-1.08%
6M
3.42%
YTD
1.18%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.65M$25.43M$23.00M
$4.26M$3.99M$7.47M

GARP vs. TGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
16.89%21.49%37.42%15.02%
TGRT
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
1.18%16.94%32.85%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and TGRT is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023

0.93

The correlation between GARP and TGRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

GARP vs. TGRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GARP
TGRT

Technology

54.7%
53.5%

Communication Services

11.0%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
7.6%

Financial Services

7.9%
5.9%

Industrials

6.4%
7.2%

Healthcare

5.4%
8.5%

Energy

3.0%
0.2%

Utilities

1.3%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Technology

GARP
54.7%
TGRT
53.5%

Communication Services

GARP
11.0%
TGRT
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GARP
9.1%
TGRT
7.6%

Financial Services

GARP
7.9%
TGRT
5.9%

Industrials

GARP
6.4%
TGRT
7.2%

Healthcare

GARP
5.4%
TGRT
8.5%

Energy

GARP
3.0%
TGRT
0.2%

Utilities

GARP
1.3%
TGRT
0.5%

Basic Materials

GARP
1.1%
TGRT
0.2%

Real Estate

GARP
0.4%
TGRT

-

Consumer Defensive

GARP

-

TGRT
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. TGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRT
TGRT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TGRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GARP vs. TGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GARPTGRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.09

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

0.44

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

1.36

+6.63

GARP vs. TGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the TGRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and TGRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARP vs. TGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than TGRT's maximum drawdown of -22.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and TGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPTGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-22.04%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-17.89%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-22.04%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-5.79%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-3.36%

-3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

5.82%

-2.07%

Volatility

GARP vs. TGRT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) at 5.11%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPTGRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

5.11%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.18%

14.20%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

17.66%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

19.20%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

19.20%

+4.72%

GARP vs. TGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRT's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARP vs. TGRT - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than TGRT's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%
TGRT
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
0.08%0.08%0.09%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GARP and TGRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to TGRT (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs TGRT's -22.04%.

On 3-year performance, GARP leads with 28.85% vs 19.48% for TGRT. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TGRT has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GARP has performed better with a 28.85% return vs 19.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TGRT.

GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.08% for TGRT.

GARP is categorized as Quality Factor, while TGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.38% for TGRT.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and TGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer