GARP vs. SMH
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 19.24%/yr vs 37.89%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
GARP vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 66.10% return.
GARP
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 17.00%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 37.42%
- 3Y*
- 32.09%
- 5Y*
- 19.24%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 66.10%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 137.42%
- 3Y*
- 60.43%
- 5Y*
- 37.89%
- 10Y*
- 36.92%
GARP vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 17.00% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 66.10% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 51.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and SMH is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between GARP and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
GARP vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Technology
GARP
SMH
Communication Services
GARP
SMH
-
Financial Services
GARP
SMH
-
Industrials
GARP
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
SMH
-
Healthcare
GARP
SMH
-
Energy
GARP
SMH
-
Utilities
GARP
SMH
-
Basic Materials
GARP
SMH
-
Real Estate
GARP
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
SMH
GARP vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GARP | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.62 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 9.26 | -6.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | 34.80 | -23.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GARP | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 4.27 | -2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 1.08 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.33 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
GARP vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -84.96% | +53.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -14.93% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -35.74% | +12.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -45.30% | +14.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -6.23% | +1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -41.07% | +33.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 3.96% | -0.53% |
Volatility
GARP vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) is 6.79%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 15.45%. This indicates that GARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 15.45% | -8.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.70% | 26.71% | -12.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 32.42% | -13.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 35.32% | -13.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.94% | 32.75% | -8.81% |
GARP vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARP vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and SMH have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to GARP (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 37.89% vs 19.24% for GARP. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 6.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.89% return vs 19.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer