GARP vs. QUS
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 20.74%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
GARP vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 7.13% return.
GARP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 12.94%
- YTD
- 22.17%
- 6M
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 33.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
GARP vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 22.17% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 7.13% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 9.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and QUS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between GARP and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GARP vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
QUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
QUS
Communication Services
GARP
QUS
Financial Services
GARP
QUS
Industrials
GARP
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
QUS
Healthcare
GARP
QUS
Energy
GARP
QUS
Utilities
GARP
QUS
Basic Materials
GARP
QUS
Real Estate
GARP
QUS
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
QUS
GARP vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GARP | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 2.06 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.33 | 2.94 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 2.77 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.74 | 12.37 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GARP | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.06 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.80 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.77 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
GARP vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -33.78% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -6.85% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -13.94% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -22.30% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.07% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -3.70% | -3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 1.53% | +1.87% |
Volatility
GARP vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.80%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 1.80% | +3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 6.68% | +7.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 9.08% | +8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 14.32% | +7.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 16.42% | +7.48% |
GARP vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GARP and QUS have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GARP vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and QUS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to QUS (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.74% vs 11.37% for QUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP and QUS have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.
GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer