PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 7.13% return.


GARP

1D
-0.01%
1M
12.94%
YTD
22.17%
6M
23.18%
1Y
46.14%
3Y*
33.92%
5Y*
20.74%
10Y*

QUS

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.61%
YTD
7.13%
6M
7.86%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
13.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
22.17%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
7.13%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and QUS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020

0.81

The correlation between GARP and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GARP vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GARP
QUS

Technology

56.7%
26.3%

Communication Services

12.0%
10.2%

Financial Services

7.5%
14.6%

Industrials

6.9%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
5.8%

Healthcare

5.4%
13.4%

Energy

2.7%
4.6%

Utilities

1.4%
3.6%

Basic Materials

0.9%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.2%

Technology

GARP
56.7%
QUS
26.3%

Communication Services

GARP
12.0%
QUS
10.2%

Financial Services

GARP
7.5%
QUS
14.6%

Industrials

GARP
6.9%
QUS
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GARP
6.1%
QUS
5.8%

Healthcare

GARP
5.4%
QUS
13.4%

Energy

GARP
2.7%
QUS
4.6%

Utilities

GARP
1.4%
QUS
3.6%

Basic Materials

GARP
0.9%
QUS
2.3%

Real Estate

GARP
0.4%
QUS
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

GARP

-

QUS
9.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GARPQUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

2.06

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

2.94

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.77

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.74

12.37

+1.37

GARP vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GARPQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.06

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.80

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.77

+0.13

Drawdowns

GARP vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-33.78%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-6.85%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-13.94%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-22.30%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.07%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-3.70%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

1.53%

+1.87%

Volatility

GARP vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.80%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

1.80%

+3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

6.68%

+7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

9.08%

+8.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

14.32%

+7.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.90%

16.42%

+7.48%

GARP vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GARP and QUS have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GARP vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARP and QUS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to QUS (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.74% vs 11.37% for QUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP and QUS have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.

GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer