PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. QOWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. QOWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than QOWZ's -0.59% return.


GARP

1D
-0.01%
1M
12.94%
YTD
22.17%
6M
23.18%
1Y
46.14%
3Y*
33.92%
5Y*
20.74%
10Y*

QOWZ

1D
-0.68%
1M
7.33%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. QOWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
22.17%21.49%37.42%4.63%
QOWZ
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF
-0.59%7.24%33.16%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and QOWZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.86

The correlation between GARP and QOWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

GARP vs. QOWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GARP
QOWZ

Technology

56.7%
57.9%

Communication Services

12.0%
8.5%

Financial Services

7.5%
5.1%

Industrials

6.9%
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
4.1%

Healthcare

5.4%
9.8%

Energy

2.7%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

2.1%

Technology

GARP
56.7%
QOWZ
57.9%

Communication Services

GARP
12.0%
QOWZ
8.5%

Financial Services

GARP
7.5%
QOWZ
5.1%

Industrials

GARP
6.9%
QOWZ
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GARP
6.1%
QOWZ
4.1%

Healthcare

GARP
5.4%
QOWZ
9.8%

Energy

GARP
2.7%
QOWZ

-

Utilities

GARP
1.4%
QOWZ

-

Basic Materials

GARP
0.9%
QOWZ

-

Real Estate

GARP
0.4%
QOWZ

-

Consumer Defensive

GARP

-

QOWZ
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. QOWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

QOWZ
QOWZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
QOWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QOWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
QOWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
QOWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
QOWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. QOWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GARPQOWZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

0.34

+2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

0.57

+2.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.07

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

0.36

+3.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.74

0.95

+12.79

GARP vs. QOWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the QOWZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and QOWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GARPQOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

0.34

+2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.95

-0.04

Drawdowns

GARP vs. QOWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than QOWZ's maximum drawdown of -20.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and QOWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPQOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-20.36%

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-17.81%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-4.38%

+4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-3.98%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

6.70%

-3.30%

Volatility

GARP vs. QOWZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) have volatilities of 4.87% and 4.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPQOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

4.86%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

11.95%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

15.28%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

19.27%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.90%

19.27%

+4.63%

GARP vs. QOWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QOWZ's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARP vs. QOWZ - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than QOWZ's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%
QOWZ
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF
0.26%0.28%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARP and QOWZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to QOWZ (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs QOWZ's -20.36%.

On 1-year performance, GARP leads with 46.14% vs 5.20% for QOWZ. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GARP has performed better with a 46.14% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QOWZ.

GARP and QOWZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.25%.

GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while QOWZ tracks Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.39% for QOWZ.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and QOWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer