GARP vs. PLDR
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and PLDR (Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while PLDR is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada. GARP is passively managed, while PLDR is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PLDR.
Performance
GARP vs. PLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GARP
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 18.49%
- 1Y
- 33.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.83%
- 5Y*
- 17.98%
- 10Y*
- —
PLDR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARP vs. PLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 18.49% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 19.74% |
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF | 1.69% | 12.03% | 23.47% | 27.47% | -22.52% | 11.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and PLDR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.92 |
The correlation between GARP and PLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GARP vs. PLDR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
PLDR
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
PLDR
Communication Services
GARP
PLDR
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
PLDR
Financial Services
GARP
PLDR
Industrials
GARP
PLDR
Healthcare
GARP
PLDR
Energy
GARP
PLDR
Utilities
GARP
PLDR
Basic Materials
GARP
PLDR
Real Estate
GARP
PLDR
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
PLDR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. PLDR — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
PLDR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GARP vs. PLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GARP | PLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GARP vs. PLDR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | PLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | — | — |
Volatility
GARP vs. PLDR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | PLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.29% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | — | — |
GARP vs. PLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PLDR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARP vs. PLDR - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while PLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and PLDR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PLDR.
PLDR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PLDR is Sustainable. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Power Corporation of Canada. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.59% for PLDR.
Find the right allocation for GARP and PLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer