PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. NEAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. NEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than NEAR's 0.79% return.


GARP

1D
0.21%
1M
3.69%
YTD
16.96%
6M
17.70%
1Y
38.39%
3Y*
31.05%
5Y*
18.96%
10Y*

NEAR

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.16%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
2.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. NEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
16.96%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
0.79%5.90%5.09%7.42%0.41%0.32%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and NEAR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020

0.10

The correlation between GARP and NEAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. NEAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAR
NEAR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
NEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. NEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GARPNEARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.62

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

3.59

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

16.36

-6.00

GARP vs. NEAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the NEAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and NEAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARP vs. NEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than NEAR's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and NEAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPNEARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-9.61%

-21.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-1.13%

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-1.16%

-22.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-1.32%

-29.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-0.03%

-4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-0.16%

-7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

0.25%

+3.24%

Volatility

GARP vs. NEAR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) at 0.44%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPNEARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

0.44%

+7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.12%

1.02%

+14.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.79%

1.36%

+17.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.11%

1.34%

+20.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.95%

2.50%

+21.45%

GARP vs. NEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GARP vs. NEAR - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than NEAR's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.26%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.43%4.54%5.00%4.59%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARP and NEAR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to NEAR (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs NEAR's -9.61%.

On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 18.96% vs 3.87% for NEAR. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 18.96% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NEAR.

NEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.26% for GARP.

GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NEAR is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.25% for NEAR.

NEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and NEAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer