GARP vs. BBUS
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 20.74%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
GARP vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 11.43% return.
GARP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 12.94%
- YTD
- 22.17%
- 6M
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 33.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- 1Y
- 29.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- —
GARP vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 22.17% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 11.43% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and BBUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between GARP and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
GARP vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
BBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
BBUS
Communication Services
GARP
BBUS
Financial Services
GARP
BBUS
Industrials
GARP
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
BBUS
Healthcare
GARP
BBUS
Energy
GARP
BBUS
Utilities
GARP
BBUS
Basic Materials
GARP
BBUS
Real Estate
GARP
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
BBUS
GARP vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GARP | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 2.47 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.33 | 3.36 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.24 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.74 | 14.92 | -1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GARP | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.47 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.81 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.84 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
GARP vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -35.35% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -9.21% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -19.01% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -25.46% | -5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | 0.00% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -5.46% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.00% | +1.40% |
Volatility
GARP vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.77%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 2.77% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 8.94% | +4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 11.85% | +6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 17.03% | +4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 19.59% | +4.31% |
GARP vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GARP vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than BBUS's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GARP and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GARP has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to BBUS (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.74% vs 13.80% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 13.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GARP.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.
GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.02% for BBUS.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer