GAPIX vs. LVAGX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GAPIX (Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund) and LVAGX (LSV Global Value Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GAPIX returned 13.77%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for LVAGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GAPIX charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for LVAGX.

Performance

GAPIX vs. LVAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPIX achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly lower than LVAGX's 21.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GAPIX has outperformed LVAGX with an annualized return of 13.77%, while LVAGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.09% annualized return.

GAPIX

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: 24.94%
• 3Y*: 21.83%
• 5Y*: 11.39%
• 10Y*: 13.77%

LVAGX

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 21.70%
• 6M: 20.49%
• 1Y: 39.91%
• 3Y*: 22.58%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 12.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPIX vs. LVAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund	9.77%	21.72%	24.35%	20.67%	-18.97%	20.53%	13.61%	31.78%	-11.06%	26.49%
LVAGX LSV Global Value Fund	21.70%	26.84%	6.86%	18.76%	-8.44%	21.07%	0.15%	21.99%	-15.70%	21.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GAPIX and LVAGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.89

The correlation between GAPIX and LVAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GAPIX vs. LVAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPIX

GAPIX Risk / Return Rank: 58
GAPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GAPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GAPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GAPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
GAPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

LVAGX

LVAGX Risk / Return Rank: 94
LVAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LVAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LVAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LVAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LVAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPIX vs. LVAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAPIX	LVAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	3.14	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	4.26	-1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.56	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	5.95	-3.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.39	21.70	-10.31

GAPIX vs. LVAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the LVAGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPIX and LVAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GAPIX vs. LVAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPIX drawdown since its inception was -58.36%, which is greater than LVAGX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPIX and LVAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAPIX	LVAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.36%	-42.32%	-16.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.22%	-7.03%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.31%	-16.13%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.13%	-23.77%	-7.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.31%	-42.32%	+6.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.76%	-2.83%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.35%	-6.99%	-4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	1.92%	+0.43%

Volatility

GAPIX vs. LVAGX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX) at 5.25%. This indicates that GAPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAPIX	LVAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.96%	5.25%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.65%	10.56%	+1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	13.30%	+0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	15.41%	+1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	16.88%	+1.13%

GAPIX vs. LVAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVAGX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAPIX vs. LVAGX - Dividend Comparison

GAPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.20%, more than LVAGX's 5.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund	13.20%	14.49%	14.79%	5.27%	6.66%	12.60%	2.64%	10.09%	2.88%	2.33%	1.56%	1.39%
LVAGX LSV Global Value Fund	5.24%	6.38%	2.44%	2.69%	1.52%	2.04%	1.66%	1.99%	4.71%	1.86%	2.54%	2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAPIX and LVAGX in my portfolio?

GAPIX and LVAGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAPIX or LVAGX?

GAPIX has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to LVAGX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPIX dropped -58.36% vs LVAGX's -42.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LVAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.