GAPIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
GAPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
GAPIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAPIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund | -5.10% | 21.72% | 24.35% | 20.67% | -18.97% | 20.53% | 13.61% | 31.78% | -11.06% | 26.49% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAPIX achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GAPIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 11.86%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
GAPIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -9.63%
- YTD
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -1.88%
- 1Y
- 17.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAPIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAPIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAPIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
GAPIX
CSUAX
GAPIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAPIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.63 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 2.17 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 2.36 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 10.32 | -5.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAPIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.63 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.61 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.50 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.55 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAPIX and CSUAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GAPIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
GAPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.26%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund | 15.26% | 14.49% | 14.79% | 5.27% | 6.66% | 12.60% | 2.64% | 10.09% | 2.88% | 2.33% | 1.56% | 1.39% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
GAPIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAPIX drawdown since its inception was -58.36%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAPIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.36% | -52.20% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.26% | -7.98% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.13% | -20.45% | -10.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | -35.05% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.22% | -4.38% | -5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -8.49% | -2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 1.83% | +1.05% |
Volatility
GAPIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that GAPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAPIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 3.26% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 6.89% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.02% | 11.48% | +6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 12.89% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 14.89% | +3.07% |