PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVAGX vs. LSVQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVAGX vs. LSVQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX) and LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVAGX achieves a 24.84% return, which is significantly higher than LSVQX's 12.79% return. Over the past 10 years, LVAGX has outperformed LSVQX with an annualized return of 11.83%, while LSVQX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.


LVAGX

1D
1.08%
1M
8.99%
YTD
24.84%
6M
27.99%
1Y
47.50%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
11.83%

LSVQX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.22%
YTD
12.79%
6M
14.26%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
7.46%
10Y*
8.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVAGX vs. LSVQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVAGX
LSV Global Value Fund
24.84%26.84%6.86%18.76%-8.44%21.07%0.15%21.99%-15.70%21.70%
LSVQX
LSV Small Cap Value Fund
12.79%7.31%4.23%19.02%-6.24%34.54%-5.98%20.59%-17.41%6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LVAGX and LSVQX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.87

The correlation between LVAGX and LSVQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVAGX vs. LSVQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVAGX
LVAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LVAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

LSVQX
LSVQX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LSVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVAGX vs. LSVQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX) and LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVAGXLSVQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.81

1.80

+2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.15

2.67

+2.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.32

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.80

3.22

+3.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.79

9.55

+16.24

LVAGX vs. LSVQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVAGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the LSVQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVAGX and LSVQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVAGXLSVQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81

1.80

+2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.37

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.36

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.40

+0.20

Drawdowns

LVAGX vs. LSVQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVAGX drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum LSVQX drawdown of -54.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAGX and LSVQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVAGXLSVQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.32%

-54.77%

+12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-8.48%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-25.76%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

-25.76%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

-54.77%

+12.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-7.45%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

2.86%

-1.01%

Volatility

LVAGX vs. LSVQX - Volatility Comparison

LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX) and LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVAGXLSVQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

4.19%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

10.37%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

15.63%

-2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

20.36%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

24.30%

-7.35%

LVAGX vs. LSVQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVAGX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVQX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVAGX vs. LSVQX - Dividend Comparison

LVAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, less than LSVQX's 7.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSVQX
LSV Small Cap Value Fund
7.20%8.13%1.78%4.73%2.02%1.45%1.83%2.04%7.00%4.78%2.35%3.59%
LVAGX
LSV Global Value Fund
5.11%6.38%2.44%2.69%1.52%2.04%1.66%1.99%4.71%1.86%2.54%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVAGX and LSVQX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVAGX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to LSVQX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVAGX dropped -42.32% vs LSVQX's -54.77%.

LVAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVAGX and LSVQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer