PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAMR vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAMR vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return. Over the past 10 years, GAMR has outperformed DBE with an annualized return of 12.82%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively lower 12.03% annualized return.


GAMR

1D
-0.83%
1M
13.55%
YTD
3.68%
6M
1.71%
1Y
19.82%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
12.82%

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAMR vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
3.68%39.20%11.23%6.89%-36.96%11.31%76.83%14.76%-18.82%59.47%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GAMR and DBE is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2016

0.14

The correlation between GAMR and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAMR vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAMR
GAMR Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GAMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAMR Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GAMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAMR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAMR vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAMRDBEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

2.43

-1.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

2.96

-1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.40

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

5.89

-5.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.55

11.53

-9.98

GAMR vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAMR and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAMRDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

2.43

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.67

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.43

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.09

+0.48

Drawdowns

GAMR vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAMRDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-86.69%

+31.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.36%

-14.41%

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.36%

-23.89%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.57%

-38.74%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.37%

-60.84%

+5.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.61%

-30.27%

+16.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.13%

-57.31%

+35.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.82%

7.35%

+5.47%

Volatility

GAMR vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is 5.88%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that GAMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAMRDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

12.95%

-7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

30.86%

-13.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.32%

34.97%

-12.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.35%

29.39%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

28.33%

-4.06%

GAMR vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAMR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAMR vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
0.50%0.52%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAMR and DBE have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to GAMR (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 10-year performance, GAMR leads with 12.82% vs 12.03% for DBE. On fees, GAMR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GAMR has been the lower-risk option at 5.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GAMR has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GAMR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.50% for GAMR.

GAMR is categorized as Gaming, while DBE is Oil & Gas. GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GAMR and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAMR and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer