GAMR vs. CNBS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) and CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while CNBS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by Amplify. GAMR is passively managed, while CNBS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAMR returned -0.52%/yr vs -33.33%/yr for CNBS. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GAMR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CNBS.

Performance

GAMR vs. CNBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly higher than CNBS's -1.73% return.

GAMR

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 13.55%
• YTD: 3.68%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 19.82%
• 3Y*: 16.12%
• 5Y*: -0.52%
• 10Y*: 12.82%

CNBS

• 1D: -4.55%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: -1.73%
• 6M: 24.19%
• 1Y: 77.78%
• 3Y*: -3.19%
• 5Y*: -33.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAMR vs. CNBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	3.68%	39.20%	11.23%	6.89%	-36.96%	11.31%	76.83%	8.30%
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF	-1.73%	15.33%	-29.41%	-16.11%	-63.98%	-19.02%	31.94%	-44.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GAMR and CNBS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019	0.40

The correlation between GAMR and CNBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GAMR vs. CNBS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GAMR	CNBS
Technology	66.0%	10.7%
Communication Services	25.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	3.4%
Financial Services	0.1%	1.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	7.0%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	63.1%
Industrials	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	13.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GAMR vs. CNBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAMR

GAMR Risk / Return Rank: 21
GAMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GAMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GAMR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GAMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
GAMR Martin Ratio Rank: 16

CNBS

CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 29
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAMR vs. CNBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GAMR	CNBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.74	+0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	1.89	-0.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.23	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	1.53	-0.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.55	2.81	-1.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GAMR vs. CNBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the CNBS Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAMR and CNBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GAMR	CNBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	0.74	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	-0.52	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	-0.40	+0.98

Drawdowns

GAMR vs. CNBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum CNBS drawdown of -95.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and CNBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAMR	CNBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.37%	-95.71%	+40.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.36%	-51.25%	+21.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.36%	-73.41%	+44.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.57%	-93.58%	+43.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.61%	-91.44%	+77.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.13%	-71.26%	+49.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.82%	27.79%	-14.97%

Volatility

GAMR vs. CNBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is 5.88%, while Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a volatility of 17.90%. This indicates that GAMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAMR	CNBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	17.90%	-12.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.37%	76.65%	-59.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.32%	105.11%	-82.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.35%	64.73%	-40.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.27%	61.33%	-37.06%

GAMR vs. CNBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAMR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CNBS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAMR vs. CNBS - Dividend Comparison

GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	43.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.58%	0.58%
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	0.50%	0.52%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAMR and CNBS in my portfolio?

GAMR and CNBS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAMR or CNBS?

CNBS has higher volatility (17.90%) compared to GAMR (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs CNBS's -95.71%.

Which ETF is better, GAMR or CNBS?

On 5-year performance, GAMR leads with -0.52% vs -33.33% for CNBS. On fees, GAMR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GAMR has been the lower-risk option at 5.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GAMR or CNBS?

Over the 5-year period, GAMR has performed better with a -0.52% return vs -33.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAMR or CNBS?

GAMR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAMR or CNBS?

GAMR has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for CNBS.

What is the main difference between GAMR and CNBS?

GAMR is categorized as Gaming, while CNBS is Cannabis. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GAMR and 0.75% for CNBS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.