GAMR vs. BITY
GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) and BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. GAMR is passively managed, while BITY is actively managed. Over the past year, GAMR returned 8.97% vs -45.41% for BITY. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GAMR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITY.
Performance
GAMR vs. BITY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than BITY's -25.10% return.
GAMR
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
BITY
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- 6M
- -31.33%
- YTD
- -25.10%
- 1Y
- -45.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAMR vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 2.63% | 34.17% |
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | -25.10% | -7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAMR and BITY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAMR vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank
GAMR
BITY
GAMR vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAMR | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.82 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | -0.90 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | -1.46 | +2.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAMR vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than BITY's maximum drawdown of -50.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and BITY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAMR | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -50.87% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.36% | -50.87% | +21.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.49% | -46.91% | +32.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.06% | -22.29% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.38% | 31.07% | -17.69% |
Volatility
GAMR vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is 6.38%, while Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a volatility of 10.98%. This indicates that GAMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAMR | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 10.98% | -4.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.05% | 32.45% | -13.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.49% | 41.44% | -17.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 39.38% | -14.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 39.38% | -15.03% |
GAMR vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAMR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAMR vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison
GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than BITY's 39.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | 39.08% | 21.53% | 0.00% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAMR and BITY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITY has higher volatility (10.98%) compared to GAMR (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs BITY's -50.87%.
On 1-year performance, GAMR leads with 8.97% vs -45.41% for BITY. On fees, GAMR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GAMR has been the lower-risk option at 6.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GAMR has performed better with a 8.97% return vs -45.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GAMR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.
BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.08%, compared with 0.51% for GAMR.
GAMR is categorized as Gaming, while BITY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GAMR and 0.65% for BITY.
GAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAMR and BITY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer