GAL vs. CTAP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GAL (SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GAL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.

Performance

GAL vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAL achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 8.91% return.

GAL

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.03%
• 6M: 4.70%
• YTD: 7.66%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: 6.65%
• 10Y*: 7.85%
• ALL TIME*: 7.30%

CTAP

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 4.75%
• 6M: 4.96%
• YTD: 8.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	$13.32M	$7.01M	$3.57M
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF	$682.10K	$570.69K	$694.40K

GAL vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF	7.66%	0.63%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	8.91%	2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GAL and CTAP is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

GAL vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GAL

GAL Risk / Return Rank: 75
GAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
GAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GAL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GAL Martin Ratio Rank: 79

CTAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GAL vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAL	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.97	—	—

Drawdowns

GAL vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAL drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAL and CTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAL	CTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.31%	-20.48%	-7.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.54%	-14.68%	+13.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-5.27%	+1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GAL	CTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.79%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.50%	24.78%	-15.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.52%	24.78%	-14.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.40%	24.78%	-13.38%

GAL vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAL vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

GAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than CTAP's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	1.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF	3.22%	3.47%	2.99%	2.56%	6.19%	4.05%	2.14%	2.96%	2.43%	2.26%	2.43%	3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAL and CTAP in my portfolio?

GAL and CTAP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GAL or CTAP?

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAL or CTAP?

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAL or CTAP?

GAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.83% for CTAP.

What is the main difference between GAL and CTAP?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAL and 0.10% for CTAP.