PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GAL vs. PICK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GALPICK
YTD Return11.25%-8.10%
1Y Return20.73%6.11%
3Y Return (Ann)2.82%2.52%
5Y Return (Ann)6.75%12.16%
10Y Return (Ann)5.90%6.06%
Sharpe Ratio2.330.29
Sortino Ratio3.390.55
Omega Ratio1.431.07
Calmar Ratio1.930.29
Martin Ratio15.980.71
Ulcer Index1.26%9.13%
Daily Std Dev8.68%22.62%
Max Drawdown-28.31%-68.88%
Current Drawdown-1.12%-16.44%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between GAL and PICK is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GAL vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GAL achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than PICK's -8.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GAL having a 5.90% annualized return and PICK not far ahead at 6.06%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.76%
-11.09%
GAL
PICK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GAL vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.


PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Expense ratio chart for PICK: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for GAL: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GAL vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GAL, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GAL, currently valued at 3.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GAL, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.43
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GAL, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.93
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GAL, currently valued at 15.98, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.98
PICK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PICK, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PICK, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PICK, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PICK, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PICK, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.71

GAL vs. PICK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the PICK Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAL and PICK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.33
0.29
GAL
PICK

Dividends

GAL vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

GAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than PICK's 3.90% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GAL
SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF
2.21%2.56%6.19%4.05%2.14%2.96%2.43%2.26%2.43%3.10%3.36%2.50%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF
3.90%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%2.88%3.39%

Drawdowns

GAL vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAL drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAL and PICK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.12%
-16.44%
GAL
PICK

Volatility

GAL vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) is 2.36%, while iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that GAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.36%
7.48%
GAL
PICK