GAL vs. AOR
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR).
GAL and AOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GAL is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 25, 2012. AOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
GAL vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAL vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 0.38% | 15.95% | 9.85% | 13.32% | -13.41% | 12.23% | 9.33% | 19.59% | -7.71% | 18.67% |
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | -1.02% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -5.82% | 15.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAL achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than AOR's -1.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GAL having a 7.52% annualized return and AOR not far ahead at 7.74%.
GAL
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
AOR
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAL vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAL vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank
GAL
AOR
GAL vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAL | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.99 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.97 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 8.58 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAL | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.57 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.73 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.65 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAL and AOR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GAL vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
GAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than AOR's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 3.38% | 3.47% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 6.19% | 4.05% | 2.14% | 2.96% | 2.43% | 2.26% | 2.43% | 3.10% |
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.57% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
Drawdowns
GAL vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAL drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, which is greater than AOR's maximum drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAL and AOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAL | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.31% | -24.44% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -7.62% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -21.72% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.31% | -22.95% | -5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -4.82% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -3.50% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.75% | -0.02% |
Volatility
GAL vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) have volatilities of 4.37% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAL | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 4.35% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 6.49% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92% | 10.73% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.41% | 10.49% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.32% | 10.64% | +0.68% |