GABGX vs. SCHG
GABGX (Gabelli Growth Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GABGX returned 16.71%/yr vs 18.92%/yr for SCHG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GABGX charges 1.34%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
GABGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABGX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GABGX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 16.71%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.92% annualized return.
GABGX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 6.02%
- 1Y
- 22.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
GABGX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABGX Gabelli Growth Fund | 7.05% | 18.67% | 35.38% | 45.39% | -39.04% | 22.48% | 39.11% | 34.19% | 1.89% | 29.51% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 7.74% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between GABGX and SCHG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009 | 0.97 |
The correlation between GABGX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GABGX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
GABGX
SCHG
GABGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GABGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 1.76 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 2.37 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.31 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.70 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 5.70 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GABGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.76 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.73 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.88 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.85 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
GABGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABGX drawdown since its inception was -66.39%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABGX and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GABGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.39% | -34.59% | -31.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -16.41% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.39% | -23.39% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.36% | -34.59% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.36% | -34.59% | -7.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -5.20% | -11.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 4.90% | -0.11% |
Volatility
GABGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.31%. This indicates that GABGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GABGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 3.31% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 11.56% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.48% | 15.45% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 22.27% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 21.55% | +0.96% |
GABGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
GABGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
GABGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABGX Gabelli Growth Fund | 5.12% | 5.49% | 6.27% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 5.03% | 7.02% | 11.48% | 5.66% | 6.28% | 5.17% | 8.19% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GABGX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GABGX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to SCHG (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABGX dropped -66.39% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GABGX and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer