PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABGX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABGX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABGX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 11.27% return.


GABGX

1D
0.64%
1M
5.02%
YTD
7.05%
6M
6.02%
1Y
22.15%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
16.71%

FNILX

1D
0.30%
1M
5.40%
YTD
11.27%
6M
11.56%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABGX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GABGX
Gabelli Growth Fund
7.05%18.67%35.38%45.39%-39.04%22.48%39.11%34.19%-16.99%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
11.27%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between GABGX and FNILX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.91

The correlation between GABGX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABGX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABGX
GABGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GABGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GABGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABGX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GABGXFNILXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

2.50

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

3.38

-1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

3.30

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.89

15.12

-10.22

GABGX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABGX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GABGXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.50

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.81

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.76

-0.21

Drawdowns

GABGX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABGX drawdown since its inception was -66.39%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABGX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABGXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.39%

-33.76%

-32.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-9.01%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.39%

-19.08%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.36%

-25.40%

-16.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.69%

-5.37%

-11.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

1.97%

+2.82%

Volatility

GABGX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 2.88%. This indicates that GABGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABGXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

2.88%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

9.00%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.48%

11.95%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

17.25%

+6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

20.04%

+2.47%

GABGX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABGX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

GABGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GABGX
Gabelli Growth Fund
5.12%5.49%6.27%1.66%0.00%5.03%7.02%11.48%5.66%6.28%5.17%8.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABGX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABGX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FNILX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABGX dropped -66.39% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABGX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer