GABF vs. KDVD
GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) and KDVD (Keeley Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while KDVD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GABF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for KDVD.
Performance
GABF vs. KDVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABF achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than KDVD's 10.24% return.
GABF
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -6.24%
- 1Y
- -3.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KDVD
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GABF vs. KDVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -7.03% | 1.47% |
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 10.24% | -0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GABF and KDVD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GABF vs. KDVD — Risk / Return Rank
GABF
KDVD
GABF vs. KDVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GABF | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GABF | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.44 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
GABF vs. KDVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABF drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, which is greater than KDVD's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABF and KDVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GABF | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -10.98% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.60% | -2.57% | -9.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -2.97% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.27% | — | — |
Volatility
GABF vs. KDVD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GABF | KDVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 15.20% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 15.20% | +5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 15.20% | +5.34% |
GABF vs. KDVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than KDVD's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GABF vs. KDVD - Dividend Comparison
GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than KDVD's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.11% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% |
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 0.71% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GABF and KDVD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KDVD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KDVD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GABF.
GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.71% for KDVD.
GABF is categorized as Financials Equities, while KDVD is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GABF and 0.00% for KDVD.
Find the right allocation for GABF and KDVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer