GABF vs. SCHW
GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) is Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while SCHW (The Charles Schwab Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, GABF returned 20.29%/yr vs 21.69%/yr for SCHW. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GABF vs. SCHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABF achieves a -1.86% return, which is significantly lower than SCHW's 1.90% return.
GABF
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- -4.43%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHW
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 10.44%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
GABF vs. SCHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -1.86% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | -0.04% |
SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 1.90% | 36.65% | 9.17% | -15.97% | 31.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GABF and SCHW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between GABF and SCHW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GABF vs. SCHW — Risk / Return Rank
GABF
SCHW
GABF vs. SCHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GABF | SCHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.09 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 0.53 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 1.16 | -1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GABF vs. SCHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABF drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum SCHW drawdown of -86.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABF and SCHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GABF | SCHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -86.79% | +65.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.16% | -19.83% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.86% | -27.11% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.69% | -5.04% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -35.48% | +30.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.79% | 9.04% | -1.25% |
Volatility
GABF vs. SCHW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) is 4.51%, while The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that GABF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GABF | SCHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 8.40% | -3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 20.79% | -7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 25.25% | -7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 32.18% | -11.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 33.10% | -12.66% |
Dividends
GABF vs. SCHW - Dividend Comparison
GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than SCHW's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.00% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 1.17% | 1.08% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.01% | 0.86% | 1.36% | 1.43% | 1.11% | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GABF and SCHW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHW has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to GABF (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABF dropped -20.86% vs SCHW's -86.79%.
SCHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GABF and SCHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer