GABF vs. GGRW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) and GGRW (Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while GGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GABF returned 18.82%/yr vs 23.05%/yr for GGRW. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GABF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GGRW.

Performance

GABF vs. GGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABF achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly lower than GGRW's 2.75% return.

GABF

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: -1.06%
• YTD: -1.93%
• 1Y: -1.61%
• 3Y*: 18.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.34%

GGRW

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -3.16%
• 6M: 2.98%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 1Y: 7.47%
• 3Y*: 23.05%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	$95.56K	$89.02K	$204.10K
GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF	$8.47K	$11.44K	$22.73K

GABF vs. GGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-1.93%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	-0.04%
GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF	2.75%	18.29%	41.78%	42.19%	-10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GABF and GGRW is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.63

The correlation between GABF and GGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GABF vs. GGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GABF	GGRW
Financial Services	85.6%	10.4%
Technology	5.2%	39.3%
Industrials	4.9%	12.1%
Real Estate	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Communication Services	-	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.6%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	8.4%
Utilities	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

GABF vs. GGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 7
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

GGRW

GGRW Risk / Return Rank: 19
GGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
GGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 18
GGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GABF vs. GGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GABF	GGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	0.35	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	0.60	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.07	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	0.43	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.56	1.55	-2.11

GABF vs. GGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABF Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the GGRW Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABF and GGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GABF vs. GGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABF drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum GGRW drawdown of -50.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABF and GGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GABF	GGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.86%	-50.28%	+29.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.16%	-13.19%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.86%	-20.53%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.75%	-4.71%	-2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-16.94%	+11.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.90%	3.68%	+4.22%

Volatility

GABF vs. GGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) is 4.51%, while Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that GABF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GABF	GGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	5.36%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.17%	13.53%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.57%	16.43%	+1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.37%	25.47%	-5.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.37%	25.38%	-5.01%

GABF vs. GGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GGRW's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

GABF vs. GGRW - Dividend Comparison

GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than GGRW's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.00%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%
GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF	0.42%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GABF and GGRW in my portfolio?

GABF and GGRW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GABF or GGRW?

GGRW has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to GABF (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABF dropped -20.86% vs GGRW's -50.28%.

Which ETF is better, GABF or GGRW?

On 3-year performance, GGRW leads with 23.05% vs 18.82% for GABF. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GABF or GGRW?

Over the 3-year period, GGRW has performed better with a 23.05% return vs 18.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GABF or GGRW?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GABF or GGRW?

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.42% for GGRW.

What is the main difference between GABF and GGRW?

GABF is categorized as Financials Equities, while GGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GABF and 0.90% for GGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.