PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAAEX vs. AMAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAAEX vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAAEX achieves a 19.37% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 95.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GAAEX has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 10.98%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 36.92% annualized return.


GAAEX

1D
-0.52%
1M
5.57%
YTD
19.37%
6M
18.26%
1Y
41.34%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
10.98%

AMAT

1D
0.19%
1M
22.27%
YTD
95.71%
6M
86.67%
1Y
212.10%
3Y*
56.66%
5Y*
30.20%
10Y*
36.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAAEX vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAAEX
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund
19.37%26.64%-11.85%-2.39%-12.67%8.40%86.45%30.20%-15.49%20.68%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
95.71%59.60%1.13%67.97%-37.54%83.64%43.29%89.86%-34.92%59.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GAAEX and AMAT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2006

0.53

The correlation between GAAEX and AMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAAEX vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAAEX
GAAEX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GAAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GAAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAT
AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAAEX vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAAEXAMATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.59

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

9.99

-7.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

28.56

-18.13

GAAEX vs. AMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAAEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAAEX and AMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAAEXAMATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

4.64

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.70

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.87

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.43

-0.49

Drawdowns

GAAEX vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAAEX drawdown since its inception was -85.83%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAAEX and AMAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAAEXAMATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.83%

-85.22%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.57%

-21.37%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

-49.88%

+14.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.64%

-55.14%

+14.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

-55.14%

+14.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.08%

0.00%

-49.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.64%

-38.81%

-24.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

7.46%

-3.36%

Volatility

GAAEX vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) is 7.58%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 14.64%. This indicates that GAAEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAAEXAMATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

14.64%

-7.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.12%

35.09%

-19.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

46.04%

-26.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

43.56%

-21.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

42.60%

-20.22%

Dividends

GAAEX vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

GAAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than AMAT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.38%0.69%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%
GAAEX
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund
0.27%0.33%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAAEX and AMAT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAT has higher volatility (14.64%) compared to GAAEX (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAAEX dropped -85.83% vs AMAT's -85.22%.

AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.64 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAAEX and AMAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer