GAA vs. THRV
GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAA charges 0.41%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
GAA vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAA achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
GAA
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAA vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 9.39% | 4.28% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAA and THRV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAA vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
GAA
THRV
GAA vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAA | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.50 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAA | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.04 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
GAA vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAA | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.57% | -1.50% | -25.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.51% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -0.44% | -3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | — | — |
Volatility
GAA vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAA | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.19% | 2.92% | +6.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.28% | 2.92% | +8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 2.92% | +8.17% |
GAA vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAA vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.59% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAA and THRV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 3.59% for GAA.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for GAA and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer