GAA vs. BLDG
GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Cambria, while BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAA returned 6.37%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for BLDG. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAA charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
GAA vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAA achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's 5.95% return.
GAA
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
BLDG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- —
GAA vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 9.39% | 18.76% | 6.67% | 7.65% | -8.47% | 11.17% | 12.24% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.95% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAA and BLDG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between GAA and BLDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
GAA vs. BLDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GAA
BLDG
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
GAA
BLDG
Industrials
GAA
BLDG
-
Real Estate
GAA
BLDG
Energy
GAA
BLDG
-
Basic Materials
GAA
BLDG
-
Technology
GAA
BLDG
-
Consumer Cyclical
GAA
BLDG
-
Communication Services
GAA
BLDG
-
Utilities
GAA
BLDG
-
Consumer Defensive
GAA
BLDG
-
Healthcare
GAA
BLDG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAA vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
GAA
BLDG
GAA vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAA | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.16 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 1.02 | +2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.04 | 3.60 | +11.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAA | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 0.93 | +1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.15 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.45 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
GAA vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, roughly equal to the maximum BLDG drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAA | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.57% | -27.25% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -10.08% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.18% | -18.57% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -27.25% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -2.76% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -9.23% | +5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 2.86% | -1.35% |
Volatility
GAA vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) is 2.60%, while Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that GAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAA | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 3.60% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.41% | 8.23% | -0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.19% | 11.07% | -1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.28% | 15.26% | -3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 15.54% | -4.45% |
GAA vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAA vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than BLDG's 5.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.72% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.59% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAA and BLDG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLDG has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to GAA (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAA dropped -26.57% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 5-year performance, GAA leads with 6.37% vs 2.24% for BLDG. On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, GAA has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GAA has performed better with a 6.37% return vs 2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 3.59% for GAA.
GAA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BLDG is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 0.59% for BLDG.
GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAA and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer