G2XJ.DE vs. DLTM.L
G2XJ.DE (VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS) and DLTM.L (iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - G2XJ.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners, while DLTM.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, G2XJ.DE returned 12.60%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for DLTM.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. G2XJ.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for DLTM.L.
Performance
G2XJ.DE vs. DLTM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
G2XJ.DE is traded in EUR, while DLTM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DLTM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, G2XJ.DE achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than DLTM.L's 11.19% return. Over the past 10 years, G2XJ.DE has outperformed DLTM.L with an annualized return of 12.60%, while DLTM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.26% annualized return.
G2XJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -7.94%
- YTD
- -3.74%
- 6M
- 7.08%
- 1Y
- 60.21%
- 3Y*
- 42.43%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
DLTM.L
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -7.80%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 6M
- 10.65%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.26%
G2XJ.DE vs. DLTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G2XJ.DE VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS | -3.74% | 149.58% | 21.45% | 3.64% | -6.09% | -15.55% | 18.76% | 43.18% | -8.98% | -10.97% |
DLTM.L iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF | 11.19% | 36.11% | -22.07% | 29.42% | 14.68% | -3.00% | -18.52% | 15.35% | -0.81% | 6.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between G2XJ.DE and DLTM.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015 | 0.23 |
The correlation between G2XJ.DE and DLTM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
G2XJ.DE vs. DLTM.L — Risk / Return Rank
G2XJ.DE
DLTM.L
G2XJ.DE vs. DLTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| G2XJ.DE | DLTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 3.09 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 9.48 | -4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| G2XJ.DE | DLTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.78 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.44 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.28 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.10 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
G2XJ.DE vs. DLTM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.96%, smaller than the maximum DLTM.L drawdown of -55.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2XJ.DE and DLTM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| G2XJ.DE | DLTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.96% | -55.74% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.24% | -10.95% | -18.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.24% | -24.92% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.82% | -24.92% | -15.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.96% | -49.74% | -0.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.97% | -10.95% | -15.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.26% | -20.75% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.16% | 3.57% | +8.59% |
Volatility
G2XJ.DE vs. DLTM.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.07% compared to iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) at 5.41%. This indicates that G2XJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLTM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| G2XJ.DE | DLTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.07% | 5.41% | +9.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.04% | 16.02% | +22.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.48% | 18.96% | +27.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.98% | 21.72% | +15.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.69% | 25.92% | +11.77% |
G2XJ.DE vs. DLTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
G2XJ.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DLTM.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
G2XJ.DE vs. DLTM.L - Dividend Comparison
G2XJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DLTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLTM.L iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF | 3.50% | 3.54% | 5.77% | 4.23% | 6.82% | 3.20% | 1.66% | 2.31% | 2.17% | 1.47% | 1.44% | 2.98% |
G2XJ.DE VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
G2XJ.DE and DLTM.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, G2XJ.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
G2XJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for DLTM.L.
G2XJ.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while DLTM.L is Latin America Equities. G2XJ.DE tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners, while DLTM.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for G2XJ.DE and 0.74% for DLTM.L.
Find the right allocation for G2XJ.DE and DLTM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer