PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L).

DLTM.L and ALAU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DLTM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. It was launched on Oct 15, 2007. ALAU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. Both DLTM.L and ALAU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLTM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF		16.99%54.43%-26.89%33.42%7.99%-9.75%-11.20%12.80%-5.26%21.02%
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America		16.73%54.14%-26.41%31.12%13.78%-9.59%-8.76%9.52%-8.57%24.51%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DLTM.L having a 16.99% return and ALAU.L slightly lower at 16.73%. Over the past 10 years, DLTM.L has underperformed ALAU.L with an annualized return of 8.06%, while ALAU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.

DLTM.L

1D
3.25%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
16.99%
6M
27.85%
1Y
58.01%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
8.06%

ALAU.L

1D
3.15%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
16.73%
6M
27.99%
1Y
58.51%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF

Amundi MSCI Em Latin America

Often compared with DLTM.L:
DLTM.L vs. ^GSPCDLTM.L vs. EWWDLTM.L vs. ILFDLTM.L vs. EMVL.LDLTM.L vs. ALAG.LDLTM.L vs. XMBR.LDLTM.L vs. XMLA.L
Often compared with ALAU.L:
ALAU.L vs. ALAG.LALAU.L vs. XMBR.LALAU.L vs. XMLA.LALAU.L vs. FVUB.LALAU.L vs. LTAM.LALAU.L vs. IBZL.LALAU.L vs. 100D.L

DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLTM.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ALAU.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

DLTM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America

Return for Risk

DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DLTM.L
DLTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DLTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
ALAU.L
ALAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

DLTM.LALAU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

2.74

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

3.48

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

4.84

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.02

15.76

+0.26

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLTM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLTM.L and ALAU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

DLTM.LALAU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.74

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.84

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.53

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.52

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between DLTM.L and ALAU.L is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L - Dividend Comparison

DLTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, while ALAU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLTM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF		3.03%3.54%5.77%4.23%6.82%3.20%1.66%2.31%2.17%1.47%1.44%2.98%
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLTM.L drawdown since its inception was -64.38%, which is greater than ALAU.L's maximum drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLTM.L and ALAU.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

DLTM.LALAU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.38%

-51.94%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-11.71%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-27.25%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.87%

-51.94%

-2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-3.92%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.06%

-11.81%

-18.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

3.60%

+0.03%

Volatility

DLTM.L vs. ALAU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) have volatilities of 9.01% and 8.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

DLTM.LALAU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

8.89%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.14%

16.15%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.99%

21.74%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.71%

30.90%

-8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.66%

46.99%

-20.33%