PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

G vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genpact Limited (G) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G achieves a -39.27% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, G has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 1.86%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.


G

1D
-0.50%
1M
-11.40%
YTD
-39.27%
6M
-41.42%
1Y
-29.57%
3Y*
-7.05%
5Y*
-7.68%
10Y*
1.86%

QQQ

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.96%
YTD
20.41%
6M
19.46%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
22.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
G
Genpact Limited
-39.27%10.56%25.78%-23.98%-11.74%29.51%-0.93%57.66%-14.12%31.54%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.41%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between G and QQQ is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2007

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between G and QQQ has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G
G Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
G Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
G Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
G Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
G Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genpact Limited (G) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.41

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

3.44

-4.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.67

12.79

-14.46

G vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

G vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G drawdown since its inception was -64.14%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.14%

-82.97%

+18.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.42%

-11.96%

-29.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.07%

-22.77%

-25.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.07%

-35.12%

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.47%

-35.12%

-14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.07%

-0.99%

-47.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.56%

-32.73%

+17.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.74%

3.21%

+14.53%

Volatility

G vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Genpact Limited (G) has a higher volatility of 11.70% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.47%. This indicates that G's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.70%

8.47%

+3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.06%

14.20%

+13.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.57%

17.67%

+17.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.89%

22.64%

+6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.26%

22.43%

+5.83%

Dividends

G vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

G's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
G
Genpact Limited
2.54%1.45%1.42%1.58%1.08%0.81%0.94%0.81%1.11%0.76%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


G and QQQ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

G has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to QQQ (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, G dropped -64.14% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer