G vs. WNS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Genpact Limited (G) and WNS (Holdings) Limited (WNS).

Performance

G vs. WNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genpact Limited (G) and WNS (Holdings) Limited (WNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

G vs. WNS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
G Genpact Limited	-20.02%	20.55%
WNS WNS (Holdings) Limited	0.00%	0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap G : $6.52B WNS : $3.46B
EPS G : $3.14 WNS : $3.60
PE Ratio G : 11.86 WNS : 21.23
PEG Ratio G : 0.67 WNS : 1.19
PS Ratio G : 1.29 WNS : 2.57
PB Ratio G : 2.56 WNS : 4.34
Total Revenue (TTM) G : $5.08B WNS : $1.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) G : $1.83B WNS : $468.49M
EBITDA (TTM) G : $855.28M WNS : $277.69M

Returns By Period

G

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -6.96%
• YTD: -20.02%
• 6M: -10.25%
• 1Y: -25.14%
• 3Y*: -5.47%
• 5Y*: -1.59%
• 10Y*: 4.15%

WNS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

G vs. WNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G

G Risk / Return Rank: 9
G Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
G Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
G Omega Ratio Rank: 12
G Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
G Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G vs. WNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genpact Limited (G) and WNS (Holdings) Limited (WNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	G	WNS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.86	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.65	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	G	WNS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	—	—

Dividends

G vs. WNS - Dividend Comparison

G's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, while WNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
G Genpact Limited	1.87%	1.45%	1.42%	1.58%	1.08%	0.81%	0.94%	0.81%	1.11%	0.76%
WNS WNS (Holdings) Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	G	WNS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.62%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.29%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	G	WNS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.73%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.86%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.87%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.64%	—	—

Financials

G vs. WNS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Genpact Limited and WNS (Holdings) Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

G - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genpact Limited reported a gross profit of 482.29M and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.

WNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WNS (Holdings) Limited reported a gross profit of 116.60M and revenue of 353.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

G - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genpact Limited reported an operating income of 195.46M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.

WNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WNS (Holdings) Limited reported an operating income of 33.10M and revenue of 353.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

G - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genpact Limited reported a net income of 143.09M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

WNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WNS (Holdings) Limited reported a net income of 21.80M and revenue of 353.80M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.